The reality is that in a client environment you cannot afford to put this product in to service… I would wait till everyone on this list is telling you the product works…. I bought smartermail and will be implementing it this coming week on a “TEST” server. But by all accounts the product is very stable so we will probably put clients on it within weeks. In the interim I am waiting for Imail to get the next release ready and we will be trying that as well… and if that’s not ready then we will wait maybe one more time, maybe.

Richard Bowman

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith - IMail
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

 

Is this the consensus from everyone?  I have it running on a test machine with a Pent 400 and it is slow with that.  But I would guess on a regular server with dual processors it would not be so bad??? 

 

Thanks,
Grant Griffith
Web Application Developer
Enhanced Telecommunications Corp.
(812)932-1000


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

 

I would say if you're users are NOT using web messaging to go for it. Since the new web messaging was the sole reason we decided to stay with Imail we are VERY disappointed in its performance. It's basically a Lexus with a Yugo engine. Looks good but slow as molasses.

Bill

Brian Hruska wrote:

So what is CURRENT conceusus with the 2006 release?  Does it work well enough to upgrade to yet?


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to