On Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 5:31:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
> Trying to get open opinions on which of these two products is better: > Barracuda or Mail Frontier (one or the other, not another product). > > Keeping in mind when purchased it will be Linux based with Antivirus > installed (I believe CLAM is the antivirus). I can only speak for Barracuda. We have a 400 here that I'm using as just a front line defense for our IMail server. It currently is only doing tag-and-release. No accounts are being created on the appliance. It currently has 191 domains and is handling loads up to 2.4 million messages per day. As of the writing of this message, the hourly total messages received is 115,860. If it wasn't for the Barracuda, I'm sure the IMail server wouldn't be able to keep up. It does use proprietary Barracuda stuff for Spam and Virus filtering as well as Clam and SpamAssassin. However, you can't interact with the open source things they have used like I wish you could. There are a bunch of rule sets I would like to get added in for SpamAssassin that would actually make for better filtering for Spam. However, all in all it has worked out quite well. -- "This message is made of 100% recycled electrons." To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
