Agreed.
In fact ATT uses gateways themselves.
BUT... it wouldn't be the first time a telco (SBC now, not ATT, remember)
went their own way in the name if spam control.
-d
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rod Dorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 450 busy, when delivering to att.net
On Tuesday, February 28, 2006, 13:11:27, Dave Doherty wrote:
...
I have PTR records on all IPs, so I am guessing they are doing some
kind of lookup to see whether the IP that is connecting has an MX
record attached to it.
There is absolutely no requirement that a MTA that sends e-mail also be
a receiving MTA.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "The avalanche has already started, it is too
Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
