> All these limitations of Win DNS are why BIND 9.3.2 is a better DNS
product.
BIND is great for Unix, but isn't ready for Windows yet. If faced with
the choice, I would choose Microsoft DNS over BIND (in reality, my
choice is paying for a good DNS program).
A year or so ago, I tried the then-current release versions of BIND 4,
BIND 8, and BIND 9 for Windows, and all 3 were too buggy to be used.
IIRC, BIND 4 would not resolve reverse DNS entries in a timely fashion,
BIND 8 would hang every several times a day (and not be usable until
restarted), and BIND 9 would after a few hours start using 100% of the
CPU time.
Again, BIND for Unix works flawlessly as far as I know, but the Windows
port just doesn't cut it.
-Scott
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
