Wow! I didn't expect my question to spawn such a hot topic!

I think I'll let my SA expire at this point as I can't upgrade directly to
2006 and 8.2x isn't patched for the SMTP vuln. Perhaps I'll take this time
to investigate alternatives. My 7.15 version, while working fine, is getting
long in the tooth in terms of the webmail. Very old and outdated.

Troy D. Hilton
Serveon, Inc.
302-529-8640
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Pepper
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 9:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA?

Ditto.

Tom

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Comerford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 7:57 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA?


I also feel the need to add my "Me Too" to this thread, so IPswitch will not
think there is only a few that are dissatisfied.

I too have been lured into extending my SA in hopes of a stable product
coming out to upgrade to - ipswitch even acknowledged their screwup early on
and offered an extra few months to the SA's of those who renewed...
unfortunately those few extra months were not nearly enough.

IPSwitch should really smarten up and release a fix for 8.22 - After All the
codebase cannot be all that much different if the same vulnerability is in
2006.1 too.

Kevin, see if you cannot make Imail step back and gather some sanity and
issue a 8.22 patch.


  _____

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Loven
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA?



I'm going to weigh in on this at this point as well just so my vote is
registered on the off chance Ipswitch is monitoring this thread.



Based on the fact that I haven't heard of an update even being reviewed for
the 8.2x line I am currently researching alternative mail hosting platforms.
I was originally holding off installing 2006 until it got stable but having
a situation where I am now the proud owner of a system that was installed
less than 2 years ago with a major vulnerability announced I am very angry
that Ipswitch is leaving us hanging on this. This is a core business option
for us and certainly failures in it are high profile and damaging for us.
People will not be happy if they can't get their email because the server
got owned by some script kiddie. It's inexcusable for a commercial software
vendor to NOT weigh in on this as soon as it was announced either to
denounce the vuln or to accept responsibility and at least provide a patch
for the mainstream versions of their software. I'm sure that the majority of
Imail sites are not running 2006. How could they with how unstable it has
been?



-Jason



  _____

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil Gomes
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:37 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA?



   I've been lurking in the weeds watching this discussion very quickly pick
up momentum.  I thought I was internally over-reacting in my perception that
Ipswitch has become dollar driven to the point that it's obviously become
detrimental to their client base.  Apparently that isn't just my opinion.

   I've forced myself, for the past five months, to use the webmail client
that came with iMAIL 2006.03.  There are some issues that I just find mind
boggling.  For example...

1) When I hit the key, I get double spaced.  That's a very handy feature if
you're interested in double spacing every line in every email.

2) The sent folder, at a glance, shows that all of the mail was sent from
me, but not who it was sent to. How does that happen?  Is that what Ipswitch
QA thought their customers wanted?

   There are issues with attachments that I've been questioning for months,
with no answer.

   I asked one of our sales correspondents to use this client as it would
solve a number of his problems.  After two weeks he explained that he'd much
rather live with the myriad of problems he was previously encumbered with
than to have to use this slow, buggy, irritating client.  He also mentioned
the fact that the main screen constantly popped in front of the "New
Message" screen while he was typing a longish email...  Another wonderful
feature...

   Is Ipswitch purposely under staffing for this product?  Does it have
programmers with the wrong mindset putting this together? Something is
obviously going on over there that's making it difficult to put out a
quality product...

bye for now...
-Gil



-----Original Message-----
From: "Rick Hogue"
Sent 10/25/2006 7:11:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA?

With Microsoft, you are not paying an annual service agreement over and
above the purchase price. In this instance Windows 95 is not a good example
nor would Windows 2000 as they both are much older products than version 8.x
of IMail. Also, if those companies who had the keys had service agreements
with their clients then yes they should be required to produce software to
alleviate the need for the parallel port.  I may be mistaken but I seem to
recall some court cases against Microsoft that ended up requiring them to
support software up to 4 years from its creation and to maintain patches for
the software for a 4 year period from the time of the following upgrade. But
then again I could be mistaken.

The problem with the version 8.x Imail server also effects version 2006.
2006 is a massive rewrite with minor changes made to certain parts of the
code. I think Ipswitch got caught with two generations of the product having
problems and is not capable of handling two different rewrites for patches.

I do hope that Ipswitch decides to reverse their decision to not support
version 8.x and supplies the fix for the smtp vulnerability to SA holders as
that is part of what we are and have been paying for so many years. This
non-support stance has been evident with Ipswitch management several times
before this and has lost them a large portion of the market to competing
products. This move could loose them the balance of their loyal base or
cause a class action to be taken against them. I hope that does not happen.



Rick Hogue

Intent.Net



  _____

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 2:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA?



So if a vulnerability is discovered in Windows 95, Microsoft should spend
the time and resources developing a patch to fix it?



What about all those software vendors that were using old style parallel
port keys that became obsolete when Windows XP came out? Should those
software vendors have been forced to provide entirely new versions of
software and keys that were working perfectly fine under DOS 6.22 or Windows
3.1 for free?



John T

eServices For You



"Seek, and ye shall find!"



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim F.
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 9:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA?



>> The answer is obvious, time to drop Imail. <<



The only problem is that the alternatives aren't exactly that great.
SmarterMail looks like a great product, but it's still lacking some of the
fundamental elements of a corporate mail server like TLS.  They also remind
me now of how IPswitch was 5 or 6 years ago.  I'm afraid that if I jump ship
to SM, in a few years they'll start going down the same over-priced,
feature-bloated, performance-lacking, unstability-ridden road that Ipswitch
(and Declude) did.  I've looked at the other alternative products and none
are really that viable IMO.



I would love it if there were a full featured Open Source mail server.  Not
that I am looking to save money - I'd just like to be able to use a product
that is driven by functionality instead of the bean counters.



FWIW, I didn't renew my IMail service agreement that expired a month or two
ago.  I'm not sure what I'm holding out for, but I don't want to feel like
I'm being robbed by paying Ipswitch to use their product.  That said, I'm
not using a version with a vulnerability in it, but that shouldn't matter.
If a vulnerability is discovered in any version of a piece of software, the
vendor should provide a patch regardless of SA status.



  _____

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tyran Ormond
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 6:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA?

On 05:41 PM 10/23/2006 -0400, it would appear that Mike N wrote:

Now that there's been an SMTP exploit released (yesterday) for the recently
patched SMTP bug, you are running on borrowed time until someone decides to
try it on your server.


Stay with possibly exploitable version of the server or upgrade to a feature
and bug rich version that doesn't have the exploit?  The answer is obvious,
time to drop Imail.  It's been a long run (7 years) but the handwriting is
clearly on the wall.

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Troy D. Hilton <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Subject: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA?

Weve been running Imail 7.15 for a few years now and its been running very
well. Well, its time to renew my SA with Ipswitch but Im wondering is it
worth it?





In following this list I see that the latest versions of Imail have been far
from stellar, so Im know I will not be upgrading to 2006.x anytime soon. I
think Ive seen that 8.22 is pretty stable but is it worth the upgrade from
a 7.15 thats old but stable, to a 8.22? Is it worth it for me to spend the
money for an SA for Imail?





Opinions?




Tyran Ormond
Programmer/LAN Administrator
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List
Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.11/494 - Release Date: 10/24/2006



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.11/494 - Release Date: 10/24/2006


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to