Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 login changes?

Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:28:13 -0800

Title: 2006.1 login changes?
 
  Jim,
   The sso.html only applies if you have implemented single signon or have a client who wants to log in from an external or heavily branded page - following the sample technique at http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20051206-DM06.htm
 
    You're right, the new hdnPwdChanged field is causing the browser's password to be ignored.  The solution is to check the boxes "remember my username" and "remember my password" on the login screen.   Then it accepts the browser's stored password.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim F.
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 3:16 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 login changes?

Hi Mike,
 
When I use the password stored in Firefox (it's the correct password) login fails.  I have to manually type the password, and it's annoying.  I'm guessing the code you posted has something to do with that.
 
However, when I search the web directory for 'sso.html' or 'hdnPwdChanged', nothing comes up.  Where is this value set?
 
Thanks,
Jim Frasch
2006.1

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike N
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 login changes?

Yes, you have to add a new field - if you are using the sso.html field as follows -
 
loginhtml = loginhtml.replace('name="hdnPwdChanged"', 'name="hdnPwdChanged" value="yes"');
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:26 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 login changes?

Were there any changes to the login pages from 2006.04a to 2006.1? One of our clients uses an extranet that logs users into imail from a link.

Thanks,

Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644

Reply via email to