Yes, you're correct. It's my experience that Clam is extremely inefficient
in the Windows environment. The fastest was F-Prot but since they changed
their license model it's no longer affordable. We now prefer AVG. Not
nearly as fast as F-Prot, but lightyears faster than Clam.
-Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Imail Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 4:30 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] ClamAV with 2006.2
Hi,
We installed ClamAV for the first time on our test 2006.2 machine. It
seems
to run really heavy in the CPUs -- sometimes pegging the CPU for minutes.
Is this normal for Clam? Is there a way to prevent this?
Thanks,
Ben
BC Web
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
