Interesting...
As a separate report, the mail itself would not be delayed, and when
messages were sent to NUL, we would still be able to count and potentially
identify them.
{:-/
_M
----- Original Message -----
From: Tyran Ormond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 15:10
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] problem with rules.ima
> On 02:22 PM 05/19/2000 -0400, it would appear that Madscientist wrote:
> >It would be nice to know that you really caught these with the filename=
and
> >not some other rule you may have in place.
> >
> >I keep asking IPSwitch to include a tag in the header of messages that
are
> >redirected by their rules so that we can look at the header and see which
> >rule fired to move the message. That would really clear up this
confusion,
> >and would help when fixing rules that catch things we don't want to
catch.
> >
> >It seems like such a simple thing. I wish they weren't so deaf.
> >
> >Maybe if a few more people ask for this they'll hear it.
>
> Yes, even if it were a completely separate report, knowing which rule
> triggers would be a great tool!
>
> Tyran Ormond
> LAN Technician/Programmer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
