> > Do they advertise "unlimited access?"

> Huh?  I'm not sure what you mean with regards to email.

It's kind of funny, I had this problem on Friday, with someone in our company using 
AT&T.  Since we have virus scanning and IMail on the same machine, I opened up the 
port that IMail uses, so this person could get his E-mail sent.  The change in the 
firewall wasn't going to be made until after I left for the day.  That night, I 
checked to make sure that the new port was open, and it was... but I nearly paniced 
when I found out that the normal SMTP port (that all incoming E-mail comes in on) was 
down!  Later in the weekend, I confirmed with my ISP (a local one) that they are 
blocking SMTP port access.

My ISP obviously thought I was a hacker (I mentioned that I administer a mail server 
and oversee others, and they said that they couldn't imagine how I could need access 
to the SMTP port on my mail server).  I explained almost 10 different reasons why I 
need access to the SMTP port.  Unfortunately, they are not restricting access to the 
SMTP port, they are eliminating it for everyone.  There is no way to access it.

One person in this list mentioned that it just meant an extra hop for his outgoing 
E-mail.  That isn't the problem.  The problem is that the only way to make sure that 
your mail server is up and running, and the only way to make sure it is configured 
properly and is working properly is to connect to it via the SMTP port.  The way I had 
always understood, "Full Internet Access" means that you can connect to any port on 
any computer.

Am I the only one who connects to port 25 to check out my server?  I can certainly see 
the need to block unnecessary access to port 25 (we of all people should understand 
that).  However, is it unreasonable of me to expect that I should be able to find an 
ISP that allows this?  If all dialup ISPs deny access to the SMTP port, how can I test 
things from home?
                               -Scott
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

Reply via email to