>I'd like to run the Win2K IIS Default SMTP server concurrently with the
>IMAIL SMTP server on the same box. This would allow me to configure the
>Win2K server to listen on another port (such as 111) for those users who
>can't connect on port 25 due to ISP port filtering.
>
>Is this feasible?
yes
>The Win2K server offers SMTP Auth
where does it get the username and password, from the W2K user accounts?
>and is fully
>configurable for the listening port, as well as the output port. I would
>like to have the Win2K server listen on port 111, and output on port 25.
let it output like most SMTP servers on any non-privileged port
(above 1023). Why contrain its output to a single port?
>Would this create a conflict with the IMAIL SMTP server (i.e. both having
>the same output port)?
I dunno, but there's no need to do it, so why do it?
>Or would it be reasonable to disable the IMAIL SMTP
>server completely
unreasonable, how would Imail send mail to remote servers or receive
mail to Imail mailboxes?
>and configure the Win2K server to listen on both ports
>111 and port 25.
configure it to listen port 110 or 26 or whatever, but let the
sending occur on any free tcp port above 1023.
>Then we would use the IMAIL server for POP3 and other non
>SMTP services. What, if any, are the downsides of this option?
fatal: MS SMTP server doesn't know how to deliver incoming mail to
Imail mailboxes.
Len
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : Binary for ISC BIND 8.2.3 for NT4 & W2K
http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
