> Is there a significant technical/political/socialogical reason for > not changing it to meet to RFCs terminology?
The "X1" is used for Imail peering, so if you mixed an old and a fixed version in a peer group, the fixed version would be seen as incompatible. The solution is to allow *full* customization of the 220 code, allowing people no stay non-compliant if they need to (with documentation of such a scenario). Then, going forward, put the Imail-specific identifier at the tail of the 220 code, not the head. Sandy Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked questions: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
