Why not just monitor the changes the patch/upgrade applications make to the registry and files, then apply those same updates to the remote servers? I assume all the remote servers are running identical versions, it's a pretty standard procedure in enterprise management.
Jonathan At 12:05 AM 3/16/2002 -0600, you wrote: >adduser.exe have an argument / switch to make a certain user the >Administrative User for the mail host. >Command line arguments / switches to remotely connect to a server and >install IMail fully, IMail upgrades, and IMail Service Packs, with all >configurable options, and dialogue suppression. > >Any body else think so, or care? >I just spent 10 hours upgrading 243 Windows 2000 IMail servers to running >6.05 to V7.06 SP2... >I scripted as much as I could, but never the less, I had to physically >connect to the box, and click through the dialogue... >euck =P'.`, >Lemme know if any of you know how to directly contact ipswitch for >suggestions etc, or if you agree... >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Ghost. >:::::::::::::: >Unix is like a wigwam, no gates, no windows, and an apache inside. >.root >...Ending Transmission >/. > > >Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >to be removed from this list. > >An Archive of this list is available at: >http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > >Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked >questions: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked questions: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
