|
Ron,
I
can't do that! That would be the RIGHT way to fix it! Where's
the job security? What am I going to do with our
expensive issue tracking system? How am I
supposed to bill for overtime? I was planning to build some kind
of
complex, CPU-intensive process! How am I going to
explain to the customer that we DON'T need 30 more servers?!
What
will happen to Dell and Compaq if we stop buying servers and use our obsolete
quad-1.5GHz machines from
last
month? What will happen to Siebel if we don't have any more
issues?! The economy could be in
ruins!
Heh
heh...
Actually, you're (obviously) right. That would be
better, but I, personally, just needed something quick for one of
my
"knows just enough to be dangerous" clients. I'm going
to go ahead and load up the message in XML format
and
scrub it with a COM Object for the OWA-like rip-off interface
I'm working on. This will replace the iMail web
interface in about 2 weeks anyway.
Which
actually brings up another problem... when you Reply, Reply All, or Forward an
HTML message through
the
web interface... is there an "undocumented" tag that allows you to bring up
the reply/reply all/forward message
in
HTML format with the "-----Original Message----" junk or should I
just pull up the original message and add the
reply
information and ">" symbols afterwards?
For
example, for this message:
The
<i>formatted</i> <b>message</b>.
On reply, the tag
<!--IMAIL.MessageBodyReply--> gives me:
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 9:44 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Test message.
>
> My formated message.
with
HTML stripped out and the ">" symbol in front of every line. Where I
would expect:
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 9:44 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Test message.
>
> My <i>formatted</i>
<b>message</b>. -Norm
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Hornbaker Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 11:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Old Hack on Hotmail seems to work on iMail web users... Norm,
Have you
considered putting the textarea-display method *inside* the BeginIfHTMLMessage
block, so that it's used only when displaying html messages? The would keep your
plain-text messages displayed in the normal manner.
Then you
could add a simple script to the onLoad event of the readmail.html body tag
that would strip all tags from that textarea field, if it was present, and
replace its contents with the santized version, for better readability. As
an added bonus, you could save the original html in a hidden input field (via
the same JS), and create a link to let you open the original html message in a
new window, if desired (if it was from a trusted source, for
example).
Ron
Hornbaker
- http://humankindsystems.com - 2,595 admins can't be wrong - http://AnswerTrack.com - eCRM email tracking & routing - http://KillerWebMail.com - the name says it all - 1-888-952-4888 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- RE: [IMail Forum] Old Hack on Hotmail seems to work on i... Norman J. Nolasco
- RE: [IMail Forum] Old Hack on Hotmail seems to work... Norman J. Nolasco
- RE: [IMail Forum] Old Hack on Hotmail seems to ... Ron Hornbaker
- RE: [IMail Forum] Old Hack on Hotmail seems... Norman J. Nolasco
- RE: [IMail Forum] Old Hack on Hotmail s... Ron Hornbaker
- RE: [IMail Forum] Old Hack on Hotm... Norman J. Nolasco
- RE: [IMail Forum] Old Hack on Hotm... Norman J. Nolasco
- RE: [IMail Forum] Old Hack on ... Ron Hornbaker
- RE: [IMail Forum] Old Hack... Norman J. Nolasco
- RE: [IMail Forum] Old Hack... Ron Hornbaker
- RE: [IMail Forum] Old Hack... Norman J. Nolasco
- Re: [IMail Forum] Old Hack... serge
- RE: [IMail Forum] Old Hack... Ron Hornbaker
- RE: [IMail Forum] Old Hack... Norman J. Nolasco
- Re: [IMail Forum] Old Hack... Harlan Young
- RE: [IMail Forum] Old Hack... Ron Hornbaker
- [IMail Forum] Problem With... Norman J. Nolasco
- RE: [IMail Forum] Problem ... Ron Hornbaker
- RE: [IMail Forum] Problem ... Norman J. Nolasco
