nope, i never agreed to the contract, my son, who is under 18 years of age,
is the one that opened the package and clicked all of the i agree stuff, i
never even read it, a person under 18 is not able to enter a BINDING
contract, therefore NO contract exists, and no terms were agreed to.
hehe, i just had to do that one. been on this discussion of software
contracts before.

Don


> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil H.
> >Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:51 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Web Messaging Hack (was: RE: [IMail Forum] )
> >
> >
> >When you agree to the software licenses and agreements you can't
> >hold them
> >responsible for anything, so good luck....
> >
> >Neil
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Don Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:27 PM
> >Subject: OT: Web Messaging Hack (was: RE: [IMail Forum] )
> >
> >
> >>
> >> /begin rant
> >> lemme think, a recall a post on a list somewhere, that
> >involves a person
> >> that found security hole in hp-ux or something, hp was
> >notified many times
> >> in apparently a 90 day period, without even bothering to reply to the
> >> messages, at which point the guy posted to bugtraq or elsewhere, which
> >> resulted in HP making a claim that they reserve the right to hold the
> >person
> >> that released the information responisble for any exploitation
> >that might
> >> incur as a result. I think after i got threatened in that way
> >a few times,
> >i
> >> might use anonymous email addresses as well. it all comes down to what
> >> exactly is the correct general practice for full disclosure and to what
> >> degree vendors should be held responsible. especially in a
> >case like this,
> >> my opinion is that if vendor is notified and ignore such
> >notification, in
> >> this manner, vendor should without doubt be held responsible, even
> >> considering that whitehat releases an exploit at some point, if that
> >exploit
> >> is used against me, and i know that vendor was notified over
> >90 days ago,
> >> yet decided not to take action or even notify me that there may be a
> >> security hole in a product i purchased from them, I think it
> >is reasonable
> >> to assume the vendor was negligent and knowingly allowed a
> >product with a
> >> secutiry hole to breech my network. I think i should be able
> >to hold the
> >> vendor responsible, but with the way things look, vendors have deeper
> >> pockets than the whitehats which will likely result in vendors
> >never being
> >> notified about security holes and those exploits will stay underground.
> >> vendors should make clear what their policies are on full
> >disclosure, and
> >> make it even more clear how they handle those that find such holes or
> >bugs,
> >> whether or not they will try to make them responsible or if they will
> >reward
> >> them for using proper notification procedures, that may help a
> >whitehat,
> >or
> >> even blackhat, for that matter, to decide exactly what method
> >they should
> >> use with that vendor when it comes to disclosing what may have
> >been found.
> >> /end rant
> >>
> >> sorry, just some things that come to mind.
> >> i'll go have my cofee with lots of sugar now.
> >>
> >> Don
> >>
> >> > >-----Original Message-----
> >> > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> >Dave Salovesh
> >> > >Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:07 AM
> >> > >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> >> > >Subject: RE: Web Messaging Hack (was: RE: [IMail Forum] )
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >> person reporting. If the person thought it was so
> >important to post
> >on
> >> > >> bugtraq, why use such an address?
> >> > >
> >> > >If he didn't, we'd all know what Sandy does in his spare time.
> >> > >
> >> > >Oops.
> >> > >
> >> > >--
> >> > >Dave Salovesh
> >> > >RAM Associates, Inc.
> >> > >(800 or 202) 543-3635
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> >> > >to be removed from this list.
> >> > >
> >> > >An Archive of this list is available at:
> >> > >http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> >> > >
> >> > >Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked
> >> > >questions:  http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
> >> > >
> >>
> >>
> >> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> >> to be removed from this list.
> >>
> >> An Archive of this list is available at:
> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> >>
> >> Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked
> >> questions:  http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
> >>
> >
> >
> >Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> >to be removed from this list.
> >
> >An Archive of this list is available at:
> >http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> >
> >Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked
> >questions:  http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
> >


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked
questions:  http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to