I  will  fill  in  a few blanks for now and chime in again when others
have posted:

> Scenario:  approx.  200  heavy users with a lot of 1-3MB attachments
> (150 pop3, 50 imap4)

Give  us  a  total amount of data transferred per day..."a lot" is not
specific.  This  also  impacts  your ISP bandwidth question below, and
everything else.

> 60 users located at site of IMail server rest in branch offices, all
> using  Outlook and/or web access, moving off of Exchange 5.5, IMails
> web calendar will be used my 25% of the users.

And IMail Web Messaging as well? IMAP4 and WM like CPU, as below. IMO,
IMAP4  is  frankly not worth continuing with--a good idea never really
ready  for  prime  time. What is the use case that dictates the use of
IMAP4--users   without   laptops   traveling   to  multiple  corporate
locations?  WM can have real utility, on the other hand. Anyway, split
out  the  data  transfer indicated above: how much will be transferred
via  which  protocol,  and how much over each type of links? Remember,
though  you  can't  estimate  it, that every page view in WM has HTML,
too.
 
> A new box will be dedicated to IMail though I'm not looking to spend a
> fortune I need a stable platform for a business that relies very heavily
> on email.

If  you  have  a  budget,  tell  us  and we'll try to fit (or call you
crazy). Guessing won't help. Some orgs balk at $2500 for a new server,
others  $10K, etc. What's the Exchange hardware that you can repurpose
(and  how  taxed  was  *it*?)?  In  an  ideal world, you surround your
mailbox  server  with  smaller  servers  to distribute functional load
(anti-spam    server(s),    anti-virus    server(s),   outbound   mail
gateway(s))--but  with only enough $ for one box, recommendations will
change a lot.
 
> CPU?

Not  terribly  important for basic mail protocols (SMTP, POP3). IMAP4,
WM,  WC do like more power here, especially when encrypted; Windows in
general  likes dual to take the edge off. Depends on all those metrics
you're going to supply. :)

> RAM?

Fastest,  most  you can get. RAM and disk I/O speed are more important
than CPU.

> Disk Space?

You tell us how big you want to let leave-on-server mailboxes get, and
your  expected  rate  of adding new users--that'll give you an answer.
Pretty straightforward, compared to other questions.

> Hard Dive?  IDE or SCII - Raid5?

SCSI, but not RAID 5. RAID 1, or 0+1 if you can afford it, with 128 MB
cache  if  available. IDE RAID is acceptable, but also only with giant
cache.  As many dedicated spindles as possible to OS, swapfile, spool,
mailbox  volume(s), logs (re: that last item, I love making people ask
questions).

> OS?  Win2k Server or Win2k Pro or XP

Server. Pro/Workstation OSs will function but are a license violation.

>  Symantec Antivirus add-on or something else?

Something else: Declude Virus, www.declude.com.

>  Spam handling?

Glad  you  are  aware  of  this need. You probably should offload this
resource-intensive function to a bastion host (that is your actual MX,
handling  inbound  mail  processing/rejection).  Len  Conrad, who will
surely  speak  up,  has  a cookbook for using BSD and PostFix for this
purpose that he calls IMGate.

>backup hardware?

DLT,  AIT,  whatever  will  backup your left-on-server mailboxes in an
acceptable window.

>backup software?

NTBACKUP  is quite compact, if you don't already have a central backup
server running elsewhere. Won't back up open files, though.

> Firewall?

Of course--you don't have one already? What's the deal?

> fail-over hardware?

You  tell  us:  how long can the thing be down? Clustering is great if
you  can afford it; IMail works fine with MSCS. If you do cluster, you
can  have  an  active-active config where the secondary server runs MS
SMTP  as  an  outbound  gateway,  so the backup doesn't just sit there
idle.

> Dual nics?

Inexpensive, so no-brainer.

>Dual power supply?

Not   necessary   if   clustering   entire   servers,   but  otherwise
self-evident, as redundant NICs.

> ISP bandwidth?

You'll  have  to  give  us  more  metrics  and  the  remote locations'
bandwidth, as above.

-Sandy


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked
questions:  http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to