> An alternative is to set the max mailbox size or # of messages to > something really small.
That'll stop the mail from getting to a mailbox, but the mail will still be spooled and will also force a useless bounce message to be created. Not very resource-wise. On the other hand, if you *must* have the 'nobody' alias for some reason, creating the accounts and NULifying all messages using an IMail rule will at least eliminate the disk I/O for bounces. Again, this is assuming that *everything* going to those accounts is spam, so any post-acceptance bounces would be unnecessary. Nothing beats a 5xx, however...why do you have 'nobody' active, exactly? -Sandy ------------------------------------ Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
