|
Ted, use the Imail client on the server, go into the spam
mailbox and select the legit message, then click on
transfer.
It will prompt you to point the msg to the .mbx file of the
intended recipient on your system
I had the same prob 3 months ago, this is what Ipswitch
support suggested.
Steve
______________________________________
Steve
Jensen
VP Operations
Thirdwave, LLC
15 West Hubbard, Suite
300
Chicago, IL 60610
P: 312.329.1960 x 11
F:
312.329.1963
www.thirdwaveweb.com
Gang --
Using IMail 8.03HF1,
I'm still trying to get a handle on how to limit the number of false
positives. Out of about 3000 messages a day, I'm getting about 7-10.
Most of them are from commercial operations, however, such as flight
confirmations from aa.com, etc., while others are from mailing lists at
yahoogroups.com
Based upon the
recommendations of this group, I've disabled the use
of:
FIVETEN
blackholes.five-ten-sg.com
YBL
ybl.megacity.org
and I'm
using:
v6net spammers.v6net.org
SpamCop bl.spamcop.net
DSBL list.dsbl.org
DSBL-Multi multihop.dsbl.org
DSBL-Unconfirmed unconfirmed.dsbl.org
ORDB relays.ordb.org
MAPS blackholes.mail-abuse.org
I also
use:
VERIFY MAIL
FROM
VERIFY
HELO/EHLO
DELETE AFTER 4
MATCHES
I'm using these
provided by IMail in their default state:
antispam-table.txt
url-domain-bl.txt
The main problem I'm
having with this setup is that anything labelled spam is delivered to a mailbox
called spam. If I find a false positive in the spam mailbox and
forward it to the intended recipient, and then that recipient responds to the
message, they're actually responding to the "spam" mailbox instead of the
original sender.
I used to use
Declude Junkmail in tandem with Spam Review. This worked nicely because
you could return a false positive to the message queue and deliver the message
without the headers getting changed.
Is there such a
utility that'll work directly with an IMail mailbox? Also, rather than
having spam redirected to a spam mailbox, should I be inserting X-Headers into
the messages and then running delivery rules on them? What "condition"
statements would you recommend?
Certainly, I
understand everyone has a different level of acceptable false positives and
varying setups for controlling spam, so I'm ready for a myriad of
possibilities. For me, I don't really have a problem culling through a
spambox on a daily basis in search of false positives but I'd like a more
effective way of putting them back into the delivery cycle without them taking
on the appearance of having come through another
mailbox.
Your advice (and
examples) are appreciated.
Ted
| 