I have to agree with Sandy. If you are using a secondary service, and you have no say so about spam control on that service, that is a bad thing. Example, I offer my secondary MX server if someone wants a secondary MX. But I will not run that domain through my Imail server, where filtering takes place, unless they specifically want that filtering service, and then I discuss with them the actions I take and do they want any hand in the control.
John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 6:53 PM > To: Kenneth Porter > Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] DNS question > > > I run SpamAssassin on all my servers. More and more ISP's are > > offering SA as an anti-spam solution so it's not too hard to get > > secondary service with a comparable class of filtering. > > A comparable class, sure, but user-specific settings tied into a > weighted system and managed by users themselves are going to be > essentially impossible to replicate across company/outsourcer > boundaries. > > -Sandy > > > ------------------------------------ > Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist > Broadleaf Systems, a division of > Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------ > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
