> No it's not the same. The exploit is with the old LDAP > service in pre-8.1 implementations. The current > implementation was not interweaved into the old LDAP code. > It completely replaced it. I would suggest that any patch > that fixes any exploit, no matter how it's worded in the > release notes, be taken seriously and people should patch > their systems. >
So the problems shown here: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3049/discussion/ probably don't apply to this version? I'm just wondering because we were really wanting to use the LDAP functionality. TIA, ~Rick ___________________________________________________________________ Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com E-Mail System. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
