> > In today's nightmarish SMTP environment, the best solution is > always a > defensive MX in front with the mailbox servers behind. Which > brand of MX > and which brand of mailbox server doesn't matter. It's the 2-layer > architecture that produces the benefits.
Learned from the pain here :-) > When the one-box setup poops out, the two-box setup has never > failed, in my > experiences of the last several years, to be the solution. > > >But now the only thing I do is trimming and blocking around > 1.5 million > >mails on my front and I could if i wished to > >block a lot more. > > Why don't you do it? With 1.5 million rejected by IMGate, > how many more > are rejected by Imail/declude? > well first off all policy, we let the amount of mail at this moment slip through We do want our clients to decide what they wanna do. every body is screaming for sapm filters here and AV there but no one will pay for the fun. > >Declude and Imgate in togethernes on the frontend server > would be heaven. > > Declude and IMGate run on different OSs. You could go to a > 3-layer setup: Yes i now and thats why I put it out as a wish. Sorry to say it but I have not seen any other setup for AV scanning where i can do what i can with Declude To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
