> ...and  I  wonder how long before ISPs start blocking 587. Certainly
> it doesn't take much for spammers to switch to 587 as well.

The  most  current  concept of 587 is as an _authenticated_ submission
port.  IMO,  if  you  have  the port open, you should be running "AUTH
only"  on  587  (for  any  submission,  no matter what the destination
domain),  which  will  prevent  spammers from substantive abuse of the
facility.

--Sandy


------------------------------------
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

SpamAssassin plugs into Declude!
  http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release/

Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail Aliases!
  
http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/download/release/
  http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/release/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to