AMEN

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Will
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 12:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] OT: Primary Name Server

How about taking this "Off Topic" topic, OFF the List.  Blast each other via
private e-mails all you want, I just don't want to see the stuff showing up
in my Inbox (and I'm sure a lot of other people feel the same).  It would be
a little different if this was the first time, but this is getting to be a
regular occurrence (every 3 months or so).

Will

----- Original Message -----
From: "Len Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 12:07 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] OT: Primary Name Server


>
> >>Scott playing gotcha games, qualifying, calling me a liar, contradicting
> >>me, second guessing, puerile one one-up-manship, etc, etc.
> >
> >I think you forgot "FUD spreading" and "straw man".  :)
>
> see "etc, etc".
>
> >Seriously, though, I want you to understand that the problem isn't that I
> >hate you.
>
> never said you did.  As always, putting words in my mouth.
>
> >   I'm responding to your words, not you.  I'm not calling you a liar,
but
> > if your words are inaccurate
>
> In your opinion, which is no better than mine.  I've posted numbers here
> repeatedly to support my positions, you have never responded with numbers,
> just counter-opinions.
>
> >I will point out that they are inaccurate.
>
> who appointed you guardian of the flame of truth, AS YOU SEE IT?
>
> >   On the one hand, you've called me "weaselly", "Scott's Tea Party in
> > Wonderland", "fantasyland", "FUD from Scott", "totally bogus", "absurd",
> > "disservice", "toothless interpretation", "Quit pretending", "Always
> > looking for ways to weasel out, aren't you?", "You're playing the
> > contrarian, idiotic joker", "Mr Straw Man", "you know darn well", "shut
> > up", "don't wimp out", "self-serving, FUD-riddled", "your personal
agenda
> > of hoping to hell that...".  On the other hand, I do not believe I have
> > ever attacked you -- just your words.
>
> ... based on your behavior here. just like this post where you play games
> with "you/your words"  distinction.
>
> >The real problem is that you have a lot of knowledge, but you put a lot
of
> >"spin" on it
>
> show what spin there is??  substantiate your BS
>
> your posts drip with pro-declude spin, and anti-what-declude-can't-do
> innuendo.
>
> eg: the recent greylisting thread, where you had nothing to say about it's
> effectiveness or Imail/decludes' ability to do it (which was the question)
> but with some totally off the wall BS about some developer calling his
> thing greylisting. ie, FUD about the definition of greylisting.  The spin:
> declude can't do greylisting, so you try smear it.
>
> >and often aren't quite as careful as you need to be with the "spin".
>
> The real problem only exists only with you.
>
> >If you post something that is 100% accurate, unbiased, and not misleading
>
> your hubris is risible.  Since when are you the decider of what is
> accurate, biased, misleading?
>
> >, I'm not going to respond.
>
> absolute BS. that's EXACTLY what did with my first accurate, factual post
> in this thread.
>
> >But once something becomes inaccurate or misleading
>
> what was inaccurate or misleading about my first post in this
> thread?  answer that, or STFU.
>
> >>Every time ANYBODY tells me what I can and cannot post in this forum,
> >>they're gonna get my response.
> >
> >I didn't tell you what you can or cannot post.  I told you that it was
> >rude to post the information you did.
>
> Scott:  "Please do *NOT* publish that information that you believe to be
> sensitive on a public list."
>
> classic example: giving me (dns, security) posting advice (fat chance!)
not
> to do something about my "belief" (you know what I believe?) when I didn't
> do what you're telling me NOT to do.   That's the old "when did stop
> beating your wife" tactic.
>
> >The reason why I posted that was that you implied (perhaps without
> >realizing it) that there was a security hole that caused sensitive
> >information to be leaked.
>
> absolutely not. That was your interpretation, which, as you said, you
> didn't know what I was talking about.  You make the wrong interpretation,
> stick your foot in your mouth, and theb accuse me of
> spinning?  GMAFB.  Classic Scott tactics.
>
> >Yes, I know from your *subsequent* posts that you were referring to a
> >potential DoS attack --
>
> >  but one that few people either know about or are concerned about,
> > whereas the sensitive information issue is very well known.
>
> BS. any records that the DNS admin publishes in a PUBLIC DNS server by
> definition cannot be "secure" nor can they be considered "sensitive" since
> they are PUBLICLY available to all of Internet.
>
> >Imagine if I posted "Your website has a security problem -- if you go to
> >http://www.example.com/admin/birthdays.asp, it responds with [insert list
> >of birthdays here]" -- you would have a right
> >  to say that it was rude of me to post the list of birthdays, right?
>
> I don't police/nanny other people. that's your self-appointed role.
>
> Of the 1000's of people on this list, how is that only you have the
> puerile/gotcha compulsion to nanny/police my posts?
>
> >That's all I did -- said that it was rude.
> >
> >But then you jumped in
>
> I posted, I didn't "jump in". More unrelenting spin from Scott.
>
> >  and pointed out that the security flaw that you were referring to was a
> > different one.
>
> I pointed out that your advice to me was total BS and erroneous, based on
> your admission that you didn't know what I was talking about.
>
> >In my example, it's like me saying "But the list of birthdays isn't the
> >flaw -- the flaw is that there is some JavaScript on that page that does
XYZ".
>
> >Had you come out and said "Here's the security flaw that you have"
>
> I did, very clearly:  "allowing unrestricted zone transfers is a security
> vulnerability".  YOU needed to interpret, wrongly, that plain-as-day
> statement simply because Len posted it, not because it needed your totally
> BS "interpretation".
>
> >rather than being vague and posting irrelevant and misleading information
> >(the zone file), this issue would have been avoided.
>
> iyo. There is no issue, except your self-appointed role as list nanny,
> guardian of the truth as you see it.
>
> >I'm guessing that was your spin
>
> there was no spin in my original post to this thread.  Show the "spin", or
> shut up.
>
> >  (although I'm sure you'll deny it, for whatever reason)
>
> because "it" is your erroneous opinion.
>
> challenge: go to my original post in this thread and define any spin.
>
> >I'm guessing that you wanted people to realize that there were security
holes
>
> You're beginning to see the light, but it's a dim one.
>
> >but not know what they are, so that they would come to you for further
> >guidance.
>
> What don't you get about "allowing unrestricted zone transfers is a
> security vulnerability".  where is the spin there?
>
> >  That's OK, if you want to do it
>
> gee, thanks.  I'll stop beating my wife, too, if it's alright with you.
>
> >  -- but once you present misleading information
>
> I didn't. What info in my original post was misleading?
>
> >  (making it look like a widely known security issue
>
> I didn't make anything look like anything, except your agenda-driven
opinion.
>
> >and then admitting that it was not supposed to be that one)
>
> I have unspun, retracted, clarified nothing simply because there's nothing
> to retract, clarify, unspin.
>
> >So if you want to put a spin on your posts
>
> show me the spin.
>
> >, that's OK
>
> gee,thanks
>
> >but you have to be careful that you aren't misleading or inaccurate.
>
> Again, giving me advice about what/how to post.   shove it.
>
> Len
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> http://IMGate.MEIway.com : free anti-spam gateway, runs on 1000's of sites
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
>



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to