|
Yes, it quite possibly will. Many have success using rules to block attachments, but that can be problematic as well.
From what I have seen posted before, I would guess a false positive rate of between 5% and 20%, and attachments not being caught I would guess some where between 0% and 15%.
John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You
-----Original Message-----
Hi,
Sorry, the content went off by mistake
I got this from ipswitch forum. Will this rule block any normal mail without .com attachment??
Thanks & Regards, Business Development Executive Mobile: +91 9323182676 -----Original Message-----
Is that just a statement, or is there a question involved?
John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You
-----Original Message-----
Hello,
I have set a rule for blocking the .com attachment. The rule is
B~name=.{1,65}\.com!OR!B~begin 6.{1,64}\.com:NUL
Thanks & Regards, Business Development Executive Mobile: +91
9323182676
|
- Re: [IMail Forum] rule for blocking .com attachm... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- Re: [IMail Forum] rule for blocking .com at... Eric Shanbrom [Ipswitch]
- Re: [IMail Forum] rule for blocking .co... Dave Riddle
- [IMail Forum] lower amount of spam ... Christopher Checca
- Re: [IMail Forum] lower amount ... Martin Schaible
- Re: [IMail Forum] lower am... Len Conrad
- RE: [IMail Forum] lower am... J. Carl Wagar
- Re: [IMail Forum] lower amount ... Darin Cox
