Do you have the indexing service running, and if so is it configured to index the drive that the spool is on? If so, I would exclude that drive from the index service.
John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 4:27 AM > To: IMail_Forum > Subject: [IMail Forum] chkdsk errors > > Hi, > > I have had a HP tech arround for two days now. This morning we just about > swapped out everything from the DL360 server and put all new parts in. All > but the CPU's and the power supply. Ok, we had another problem as well > but..... When running chkdsk (without the F parameter) I keep seeing errors > like: > Deleting index entry Da142000c024ce455.vir in index $I30 of file 12506. > [....] > Deleting index entry main.mbx in index $I30 of file 19883. > Deleting index entry main.uid in index $I30 of file 19883. > > It's pretty much allways $I30. > > Someone at cnet.com writes: > ---- > "When you remove a file or folder that had 'custom' permissions, the ACL is > not deleted, it is cached. Chkdsk /f removes ACLs that are no longer used." > > Seems like this is "by design" and it disturbs people. Wish you the best in > understand the ways of Microsoft. Your issue may be quite similar or you are > mixing tools like Symantec which thinks one thing and CHKDSK which thinks > another way. > > So far, I don't see a failing hard disk issue. > ----- > He refers to: http://www.jsiinc.com/SUBE/tip2200/rh2217.htm where something > like this is mentioned. > > However..... > Running the GUI version (My Computer, C: drive, properties, toos tab, Error > checking) it will *never* finish phase 2. Phase 1 will complete, the near > the end of phase 2 it will report: "Windows was unable to complete the disk > check". > > Microsoft has a document http://support.microsoft.com/kb/169404/EN-US/ which > talks about this but refers to it being a NT 3.51 problem. A few lines later > the problem is also in NT4. They do *not* mention Windows 2000. > > This seems to be a problem on servers where: > [....] If many files are repeatedly added to a directory and then deleted > from the directory in such a way that the "binary tree" that indexes the > directory becomes unbalanced, the "index root" attribute for the directory > is repeatedly destroyed and re-created. > > Sounds a lot like a situation which might happen on a mailserver. :-( > However, we only process 4k messages a day, nowhere near what others do. > Anybody know what to do? > > Met vriendelijke groet, > > Bonno Bloksma > > --- > [E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus] > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
