1) IIS 2) IIS 3) NO, I would prefer it to require IIS. 4) Depends on what the benefits would be, I think IIS might be sufficient 5) We currently do not use PHP, but I would say it would be better to stay with IIS as it is available on all Windows Servers.
Thanks, Grant Griffith EI8HTLEGS, A Division of ETC (812)932-1000 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 7:21 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [IMail Forum] Short survery We are researching ideas for future version of IMail and would like some feedback on web servers. 1) Do you currently Run IIS or Apache? If so, which one? 2) If IMail required a web server, which would you prefer: a proprietary web server shipped with IMail, IIS or Apache? 3) Would it be a problem if IMail required IIS? 4) Would it be a problem if IMail required the .Net framework? 5) Would it be a problem if IMail required PHP? Thanks in advance for your input, Tripp Allen Software Development Manager, Messaging Ipswitch, Inc. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
