Let me try this one if you don't mind the contribution from my direction :)

.NET adds a lot of extra complexity from multiple avenues with little to be gained in exchange.  I would much prefer a DLL similar to many ASP components that one might purchase, where the scripting is done in ASP (VBScript) and the source is open for all to tweak as they see fit.

I'm a bit scared of .NET regardless of the added complexity.  It's a version 1.1 environment, and in moving from 1.0 to 1.1 my only .NET application had issues.  Microsoft is known to make changes to such things over time, and incompatibilities could result in tough choices between patches/upgrades and breaking Web mail.  .NET seems more suited to be a proprietary programing environment that can be used to drive sales of and dependencies on other Microsoft products such as Visual Studio.  That relationship concerns me.

I think that from Ipswitch's perspective, they also shouldn't want to be in the position of trying to troubleshoot other people's .NET environments, or risk the future of their Web interface by marrying it so tightly to a new and deeply proprietary environment that will definitely change over time and between versions.

Although I'm sure that there are whitepapers and lists on Web pages telling everyone the advantages of .NET, I'm not convinced that any of the so-called advantages would be necessary.  Heck, look at what we're using now...

Matt



Kevin Bilbee wrote:
Why would you vote IIS but not .net?? 

Kevin Bilbee

  
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
Peter Richards
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 7:38 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Short survery



one of my main concerns has been the seperate web server on 
imail. Imail is a mail server and should stick to its core 
competency. 

i have looked at mdaemon for this exact reason being able to 
use a proven web server for web services. This makes 100% sense.

I vote iis...but NOT .net :)

-----Original Message-----

From:  "J Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj:  Re: [IMail Forum] Short survery
Date:  Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:53 am
Size:  1K
To:  <[email protected]>

IIS
IIS
No
No
Not as long as php installation/setup provided in mail server 
installation/setup

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tripp Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 7:21 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Short survery


    
We are researching ideas for future version of IMail and would like 
some
feedback on web servers.

1) Do you currently Run IIS or Apache?  If so, which one?
2) If IMail required a web server, which would you prefer:  a 
proprietary
web server shipped with IMail, IIS or Apache?
3) Would it be a problem if IMail required IIS?
4) Would it be a problem if IMail required the .Net framework?
5) Would it be a problem if IMail required PHP?

Thanks in advance for your input,
Tripp Allen
Software Development Manager, Messaging
Ipswitch, Inc.



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses at HNB.com]


      
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

    


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


  

-- 
=====================================================
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=====================================================

Reply via email to