I use IMGate instead of iMail's IP filters. Just did a quick check and
found that my IP-based filter file has 13,222 lines in it -- almost all
for rejecting email, just a few for white listing a specific IP.

I also host email for a company based in the US that has offices in
China, Taiwan, Australia, Italy, and Germany. They love the filters and
while there is an occasional problem, it's always with a new account in
China that has chosen to use a prolific spam host as their ISP. They are
directed to choose another provider, which they do, and that's that.

The bottom line is that much of the IP space has no business sending
email, and blocking can be a valid decision in the face of the
staggering amount of garbage being sent -- to say nothing of the growing
increase in criminal fraud (e.g., phishing).

Jeff Hitchcock - [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 5:23 PM
To: Dev Anand
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] control access list

> For a private "family" server, OK. For serving the general public or
> most  businesses,  this  would be an absurd or even suicidal list to
> use.

While  our  clients  are  usually  unable  to  use  such tactics, your
condescension takes the point much too far. There are many, many small
and/or  regional  businesses  within  the US for whom it is not at all
"absurd"  to  block mail from certain country-based IP ranges. I won't
even  try to give you examples from my own experience -- there are too
many to even begin.

> And don't expect to do ANY business. . .

Come on. Any business, or business consultant, who chooses to use this
class  of  tactics will first take note of the current and prospective
geographic borders of the company. Newsflash: not everyone cares about
your  "emerging  markets."  It's pretty clear that you've never worked
for an intrastate careers site, a local real estate company, etc.

In  all,  the  only  vertical  that  could _never_ use such DNSBLs for
single-test  rejection  is an ISP, due to the naturally wild nature of
their  subscribers'  correspondents.  (Even  in that sector, there are
regions  of the US in which wholesale blocking by country would likely
be  embraced  by  the  overwhelming  majority of subscribers, but that
touches  on  cultural issues and is difficult to imagine declared in a
EULA.)

You'd  evidently be very surprised at the tests that are used to great
success  by  large  and  growing  businesses  and their advisors. I've
always  been  a  strong  opponent  of  using  these tests without full
requirements  gathering,  but  claiming that only "family" servers can
ever use them is divorced from reality.

--Sandy


------------------------------------
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

SpamAssassin plugs into Declude!
 
http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/rel
ease/

Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail
Aliases!
 
http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/dow
nload/release/
 
http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/downloa
d/release/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to