So you just admitted on an open publicly available forum that you are
violating the License agreement?

Symantec expects and should be paid for providing updated definitions. 

John T
eServices For You

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Mc Cay
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 1:47 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Expiring AV - Mandatory upgrade to ICS
> 
> I've been using an expired version of Ipswitche's AV ver 1.1 for over a
year now, and
> all I do is just download and apply the updated definitions, stop and
restart the two
> symantec services, and go back into the Imail admin gui for windows and it
shows the
> updated defs date.  I've verified this by looking at the event log and it
too shows that
> the AV is detecting and removing the newer viruses.
> 
> 
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: "Guy Deslauriers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Date:  Tue, 10 May 2005 15:58:27 -0400
> 
> Are you guys saying that it won't update the virus definition file?
> 
> 
> 
> >From what I understand with Symantec, when you don't choose to upgrade
> you're just penalized on not upgrading the AV engine but the virus
> definition updates are still occurring.  Did I get this wrong???
> 
> 
> 
> gd
> 
> 
> 
>   _____
> 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Tech
> Support
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:40 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Expiring AV - Mandatory upgrade to ICS
> 
> 
> 
> Why not just run imail with another AV?
> 
> Jason Loven wrote:
> 
> So anyone currently running the Symantec solution for Imail will be in
this
> position when their current license runs out? Well isn't that sweet. Guess
> we'll be making plans to get away from Imail then at that rate. What the
> heck do I need all that other overhead (ICS) for? Grrrrr.
> 
> 
> 
>   _____
> 
> From: Tony Norman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 12:05 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [IMail Forum] Expiring AV - Mandatory upgrade to ICS
> 
> Hello all...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I wanted to get your thoughts on a situation I am having with IP Switch,
> along with a recommendation on AV products.
> 
> 
> 
> We currently run IMail 8.05 at a school, and it runs perfectly for what we
> need.  Our AV is expiring, and IP Switch is telling us that they will no
> longer supply an AV renewal, and to maintain our AV protection, we will
need
> to go to the ICS (mucho $$$$$).  We feel this is incredibly bogus, as we
are
> satisfied with the product we have now, and all we want to do is upgrade
our
> AV patterns.
> 
> 
> 
> I have spoken with IPSwitch, and they are telling me 'this is the way it
> is'.  I wanted to hear from others their experiences and thoughts.
> 
> 
> 
> To get around this, we are thinking about integrating a third party AV
with
> our MX Guard SPAM filter.  It integrates with FPROT, CLAM, and NAI.  I
> wanted to get some opinions and experiences with others who have utilized
> this method, and what AV they felt was best.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks for your time,
> 
> 
> 
> TN
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> .............................................................
> 
> To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to