> Our mail system resides on a fairly old Sparc machine running Solaris 2.6
> which is grinding to a halt; as a start in eventually moving off this machine,
> we are thinking of moving our unix style mailbox format imap server :-
>
> IMAP4rev1 2004.357
>
> on to a Linux box with mail still being delivered by smtp to the Solaris box.
>
> Could anyone with experience of running imap over NFS please comment on their
> experiences pro and con, especially in the realm of locking.

Many years ago we experienced similar problems with NFS.

The use of NFS made sense under a simpler email services architecture but
begain to fail (i.e., poor IMAP/POP services) as load and user base grew;
adding to the problem was increasing the number of IMAP/POP systems and
using mbox files (we still do, but that's another issue to be resolved).

The solution was to scrap the architecture used for at leat 10 years,
and redesign without the need for any NFS anywhere email is involved.

I understand NFS 4 mitigates or eliminates the locking issues, but we're
not interested anymore...

-- 
scott hollatz                                        net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
information technology systems and services          tel +1 218 726 8851
university of minnesota duluth mn usa                fax +1 218 726 7674
                                                                         --
                                            "gabba gabba hey" - the ramones

_______________________________________________
Imap-uw mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw

Reply via email to