On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 17:57 -0600, Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote: > I can confirm that -O3 does not seem to yield significantly better code > than -O2. For selecting a large mix mailbox with a warm cache, -O3 over > -O2 yielded only a very small 0.047% average performance increase.
Isn't that's because uw-imap is I/O bounded and not CPU bounded? I think that even a hightly optimized assembler code wouldn't bring much improvement. -Raul Dias -- Raul Dias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Imap-uw mailing list [email protected] https://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
