On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Chuck Swiger wrote:
In the first example (which seemed to involve a single line), yes:
X-IMAPbase: 1122482547 17694 $NotJunk $Junk JunkRecorded $Forwarded
...in the second one, which seemed to involve about 8 header lines, no,
although I do see a:
X-Keywords: NotJunk JunkRecorded $NotJunk MessageJunkMailLevel
...header.
Interesting. There should be either a pseudo ("DON'T DELETE") message
with an X-IMAP: header, or an X-IMAPbase: header in the first real
message.
In imapd.c, about 10% through the file, there are lines which read:
[ ...patch elided for brevity... ]
Does that make the problem go away?
I will test this and report back. Should I stick with imap-2007 or try with
imap-2007a.DEV...?
OK, thanks. It wouldn't hurt to try 2007a, but I think as a control you
should start with 2007 since otherwise we won't know if this patch or
2007a resolves the issue.
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
_______________________________________________
Imap-uw mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
