So, opinions on what I'm missing??? Thanks, Tom Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Imap-uw mailing list [email protected] https://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
I need to ease the folder name restrictions imposed by restrictBox in
mailboxfile() but I have a couple of questions. First off, I have
restrictBox set to -1 so all flags are set.
Does the restriction of "//" have any meaning if we're not using Samba
on a Linux system? I'm trying to see where that would be a path
security problem but I just don't see an issue unless it could be a cifs
one.
Second, we're moving from mbox to mix and an older (non-restrictBox set)
uw_imapd, and I have some people with .. in their folder names. The
restriction of ".." is preventing me from converting those boxes (and
the use of them by the owners) so i was thinking of changing
strstr (name,"..") to strstr (name,"/..") || strstr (name,"../") but I
wanted opinions on what cases I was missing. I've tried tossing in %2f
to see if that would be parsed as a / but so far, it's always be literal
(foo%2f..%2fbar instead of foo/../bar).
- [Imap-uw] Hardware crypto accelerators Tom Leach
- Re: [Imap-uw] Hardware crypto accelerators Mark Crispin
- Re: [Imap-uw] Hardware crypto accelerators Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: [Imap-uw] Hardware crypto accelerators Chuck Swiger
- [Imap-uw] Easing restrictBox restrictions Tom Leach
- Re: [Imap-uw] Easing restrictBox restri... Mark Crispin
- Re: [Imap-uw] Easing restrictBox re... Bob Atkins
