On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:27:06PM -0700, Mabry Tyson wrote:
> BUT....  Today when the system got under load, our load average shot
> up to about 100.
> 
i observed the same.

> was done that would impair performance.  The only significant
> changes mentioned are
>   2006i (COPYUID/APPENDUID)
> 
i was using unix/mbox, so that seemed like a rather plausible
explanation for the observed behaviour. i tried to patch out the support
(my use case doesn't need it anyway), but either i did too little or
that's not the reason after all.

> (I'm trying to move to MIX format,
> 
i just did that and never looked back. :)
i still have the impression that it (*) is eating more cpu than before
the upgrade, but i have no numbers other than some random samples of
"ps ux", so this is as solid as jello.

(*) my c-client based filtering mda
_______________________________________________
Imap-uw mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw

Reply via email to