On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Deniss wrote:
Hello Jonathan, David
is the code at https://github.com/jonabbey/panda-imap full working
version of Mark's panda-imap ?
Can it replace uw-imap in production environment ?
On 2013.06.09. 22:02, [email protected] wrote:
[snip..]
Today's Topics:
1. Re: [Imap-protocol] Re: UW-IMAPD and its interpretation of
ESEARCH (David B Funk)
[snip..]
Deniss,
As far as I know, Jon's copy is a full version of Mark's panda-imap.
I've never actually seen Mark's final work, but it looks like his style ;)
and seems mostly complete, baring one specific omission.
As far as its being a functional replacement for UW imapd, I'm running it in
production right now. It's not quite a total replacement for the UW kit insofar
as its missing the "utils" directory (which contained things like "mixcvt"
"mixdfix" & "mixrbld") but pretty much everything else seems to be there
(including the tops-20 kit).
You need to understand that I have a somewhat atypical view of Mark's work.
I take it as a work-in-progress and add a bunch of local customizations to
it (such as adding "QUOTA" support, a Kerberos authenticator, and a local
adaptation of "black-box" mode) to create our production service.
However most of my tweaks & patches applied directly to panda with few
changes. So I'd call panda a direct follow-on to UW-imap 2007e.
Dave
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
_______________________________________________
Imap-uw mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
