On Fri Feb 24 21:23:08 2012, Brandon Long wrote:
That was in the P-IMAP proposal, which I assume means it was
discussed
in lemonade, anyone recall why it didn't go anywhere?
It forces scalability to be per-device, rather than per-user.
It generally struck me as fairly fragile, too - typically, the
server's going to erase older tokens after a while, and limit the
numbers, and there's no fallback at all.
Granted, with qresync/condstore, session maintenance probably isn't
as
important.
Right, and QRESYNC doesn't require *any* state beyond CONDSTORE's
64-bits per message and per folder.
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:[email protected] - xmpp:[email protected]
- acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
- http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
_______________________________________________
imap5 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5
