I almost always agree with Mark Crispin's comments posted to this list (as should we all). However, I think adding "move" would be a good thing since many (most?) clients offer both "move" and "copy" options to the user. Some servers could more efficiently implement move. I'm working on a server for which I'd like to block move but not copy to certain mailboxes. Forcing clients to implement move using copy means I can't do this.
Simpler is better. Matching user interface actions to protocol actions is also good. Rick Block Avaya Inc. Mark Crispin wrote: > Oh, so now you want a single-message expunge. I bet that it won't be long > before someone gets the idea that they want an atomic command to do this too. > > What about the interaction with disk quotas? > > Folks, creeping featurism is not a good thing. It is especially not a good > thing when the end user function is already possible with the existing > functionality set, and the proposed new feature is a minor tweak that may be > more efficient on some servers.
