Mark Crispin wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 02:51:49 -0600, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > > I came across similar bug in Netscape 4.79: it can't cope with UIDs bigger > > than 2**32-1, Netscape just doesn't display them! > > Do you mean 2**31-1?
Yes, that is what I've meant. > No IMAP implementation is required to cope with UIDs bigger than 2**32-1. > > > Also if my memory doesn't trick me, it crashed on UID 4294967295. > > That's 2**32-1, the largest possible UID. Correct. > 2**32, 4294967296, is the lowest invalid UID. No, I've meant 2**32-1, not 2**32. Regards, Alexey Melnikov __________________________________________ R & D, ACI Worldwide/MessagingDirect Richmond, Surrey, UK Phone: +44 20 8332 4508 Home Page: http://orthanc.ab.ca/mel I speak for myself only, not for my employer. __________________________________________
