Andreas Aardal Hanssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Had you selected INBOX/KUN/employment when you sent the STATUS command?
Yes, I assume so, although that part of the protocol dump wasn't provided by the user. > If so, this is bad client behavior because you will get all the info you > need by sending "noop". Sending STATUS is unnecessary, and may be > confusing for the client, as STATUS may return other data than what you > got from the session you're in. It's a race.. > > STATUS returns a snapshot of the information you need, and you can make no > assumptions on it being exact later on. I cannot infer this from the specification. Where does it say this in the RFC? Reading the specification, it seems legal. How would sending NOOP discover the UIDNEXT value? I don't think NOOP can do this.
