On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Larry Osterman wrote: > I do know that the bar for taking fixes is an order of magnitude higher > for NT4/ME/98 than it is for XP and W2K, since there isn't any active > development being done on them. In this case, I'm sure that it's > because the Exchange server got burned by the problem (based on the > comments in the KB article).
You can thank me for that. The first version of the article implied that it was just a Pine problem. I, uh, "pointed out" that this so-called "Pine problem" also broke Exchange server. > Interestingly enough, the fix is NOT > limited to schannel.dll, there are a boatload of other changes > associated with the fix, go figure. Yeah, I remember when I installed the Win2K hotfix. I've been waiting for the WinXP equivalent, and it still hasn't happened.
