Draft 19 of the base specificationis now available at: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-crispin-imapv-19.txt
I would like to go to Last Call on this as soon as possible. Before doing that, I would like to ask Vladimir to see if it satisfactory addresses the issues that he raised, or if we'll need a draft 20. I would like, as much as possible, to eschew mathematical language. Many problems have been due to people making incorrect presumptions based upon mathematical rules. A related problem has come up in which English and mathematics use the same word, but have different meanings; e.g. "between" and "inclusive". It should be possible for someone without a mathematics PhD to understand IMAP, for someone with a mathematics PhD to under IMAP, and for those two individuals to have the *same* understanding. In addition, draft 07 of the MULTIAPPEND specification, addressing the IESG nits presented by Ned, is at: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-crispin-imap-multiappend-07.txt There are otherwise no substantive changes from earlier versions. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/imap/imap-list.html -----------------------------------------------------------------
