Does this imply that concurrent sessions see flag change notifications in
response to the next command they issue (as Outlook assumes)? Or are lazy
notifications permissible (where concurrent sessions may get delayed
notification of flag changes)?
That does have scalability and design implications for the server in
addition to determining what the client can assume.
- Chris
begin quotation by Mark Crispin on 2002/10/1 14:10 -0700:
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Vladimir A. Butenko wrote:
>> Since a mailbox can be opened by several sessions at the same time, this
>> should be changed to:
>> ; that is, subsequent and concurrent sessions will see any
>> change in permanent flags.
>
> I make it be "concurrent and subsequent", but otherwise adopted this
> suggestion. Thank you.
>
> -- Mark --
>
> http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
> Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
