On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 03:26, Mark Crispin wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jan 2003, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > The draft says "If two or more messages have the same Message ID, assign > > a unique Message ID to each of the duplicates". Doesn't that mean that > > those messages should behave exactly as if they didn't have Message-ID > > header at all? > > No, although I can understand how you may have misunderstood the wording. > The "duplicates" are the second and subsequent messages with the same > message ID. The first message in the mailbox that has that Message-ID > retains it.
OK, thanks. That does sound better. Another thing I saw with UW, it didn't group these messages together: Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?foo?= Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?RE=3A_foo?=
