Lawrence Greenfield writes:
I suppose it makes sense, but not by the name of 'REFERENCES'.Is there anyone who wants to speak up in favor of using Subject in threading?
IMO the name can be changed, provided the draft explicitly outlaws use of that name for other extensions and tells servers that they "may" advertise thread=references in a transition period of unspecified duration.
Are there many clients that implement draft extensions, but aren't updated when the draft is?
--Arnt
