On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Timo Sirainen wrote: > This brings to my mind about the differences between my and uw-imap > implementation.. BODYSTRUCTURE description says that fields should be > defaulted as necessary but nothing more, so I don't think I'm doing > anything wrong exactly, but would it still be better to change these?
Yes, I think that you should change both of these. > If there's no Content-Transfer-Encoding, I default to 8bit instead of > 7bit. Seems safer to me. I've got a few such mails with 8bit content. There is no such thing as a standards-compliant message without a Content-Transfer-Encoding that is not also 7bit. > If there's no charset in Content-Type, I don't send it. uw-imap seems to > send us-ascii if content-type is text/*. There is no such thing as a standards-compliant message without a charset that is not also US-ASCII. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
