Bill McCoy writes:
So my comment about DELETE-EXPUNGE and using timestamp or
timestamp+sender as the basis of permanent links was based on the
fact that the Outlook/Exchange model of editability does not preserve
both copies, so that option for tracking edits is not available to
me.
...
Similarly, unless I'm missing something, searching for Message-ID as
you suggested is not possible in this situation: the original message
is gone, the edited message of course has a new Message-ID, and
Outlook/Exchange does not preserve the original Message-ID anywhere
in the edited message header or body.

I'm not sure I understand this...


You have two messages, na�vely viewed at least. The second is an edited
version of the first. As far as I can see, both the message-id and body
text may have changed during the editing.

I have a hard time understanding how these two messages can be thought
of as being the same. There seems to be no invariant property. What am
I missing?

If you (or anyone) has other ideas on how to implement permanent IMAP
URLs that will work with (e.g.) Outlook's editability model I would
love to hear them.

If everything can change, do you want the URL to remain unchanged?


--Arnt

Reply via email to