On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 00:34, Larry Osterman wrote: > There is clearly something wrong with a client specifying an invalid > message sequence number in a fetch (since the client knows at all times > the number of messages in a mailbox), but that does not necessarily hold > true for search (although the reason for this currently escapes me).
I think if client requests a too large sequence number anywhere, it's most likely a client bug and it's better to show it so it can be fixed. In this case it was Mulberry trying to apply some filter to a message it just had expunged in previous filter.
