Rob Siemborski said: >> So in the best case you're looking at performance improvements below >> one per cent. If you want actual improvements, look at keeping IMAP >> connections alive for longer, so you don't have to incur the startup >> cost so often. > > Yes, this is clearly what should be being done to solve the real issue, > which is that many webmail clients (Squirrelmail included) handle IMAP > connection managment poorly. The IMAP Proxy information on the > SquirrelMailPerformance page is probably worth a look. >
Talking about imap proxies, are there imap proxies around that do more then handle the login stage only. I.e. buffering all the unsollicited responses between 2 pageloads (in case of webmail). And if they do, are there limitations to the amount of unsollicited responses that can be buffered? Regards, Marc Groot Koerkamp.
