On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: >Andreas Aardal Hanssen writes: >> Be careful when reporting this bug to the Courier-IMAP project, or you >> might just get flamed (seriously). >I am shocked. Are you really serious?
I don't really want to spam the list too much, but here's something (although many of the messages in the original thread are gone here): http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&frame=right&th=a02d8fa4d5f6af9f&seekm=ad8a9f%242jtk%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw#link1 This is some of the messages from my attempt at posting the sequence set bug. I gave a live example, referred to the RFC, and politely stated that there is a bug here that should be fixed. I should never have used Outlook Express as the example client, of course, this I realise now. How can a so broken client be used to point out a bug in Courier-IMAP? Here's some of the goodies: "Citing a broken document as a reference won't help your argument." "I suggest on stopping this irritating waste of bandwidth." "Your messages have been thoroughly unhelpful and argumentative." "You really don't know what you're talking about, don't you?" Following this was several mails to me in person where I was told to immediately stop posting to the Courier-IMAP list. This is the reason for me starting with Binc IMAP really. :/ Andy :-) -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen http://www.bincimap.org/
