Mark Crispin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think that you should ever issue a tagged NO in response to a > FETCH.
But then what should the server do in the case of an error like EACCES, ENOMEM, ENFILE, EMFILE? paul
Mark Crispin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think that you should ever issue a tagged NO in response to a > FETCH.
But then what should the server do in the case of an error like EACCES, ENOMEM, ENFILE, EMFILE? paul