Philip Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Jarc) writes: >> I haven't been able to find any such promise in RFC3501. > > Message sequence numbers, as described in section 2.3.1.2, and the > implied mapping between them and UIDs are clearly a form of state > created by SELECT (and EXAMINE).
That state isn't broken by a NO response. The UID<=>sequence number mapping can remain the same. paul
